ChatGPT and Gemini
Where most patients already are. Both need clean, corroborated practice facts they can state without hedging.
Platform
You can't pick one assistant. Patients don't.
ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, Perplexity, and Google AI Overviews each pull from different sources and answer in different shapes. Trendzz keeps you present across all of them rather than betting on one.
Get your free visibility auditFree · No credit card · You keep the report either way
Why this matters now
Each engine weighs sources differently — one leans on review platforms, another on your own site, another on real-time web results. Optimizing for a single one leaves most of the demand untouched, and independent practices are dramatically under-cited across all of them.
Claude and Perplexity
Research-heavy questions that still resolve to a local answer. These engines reward well-sourced, clearly-attributed information.
Google AI Overviews
Google now answers above the results. If you're not in the summary, the click frequently never happens at all.
What you get
Coverage, not a stunt
One login keeps you present wherever the question happens to land this quarter.
See where you stand
Citation tracking per engine, per question, over time — so you know which gaps are closing.
Then they can book
Being named is the start. A real booking path is what turns the mention into a patient.
How it starts
1
Baseline your citations
We check which assistants already mention you, for which questions, and which stay silent.
2
Fill the gaps
Facts, proof, and answers get structured for every major engine — not one blog post and a prayer.
3
Hold the position
Citations decay. The agent watches so a quiet quarter doesn't erase you.
FAQ
Common questions
ChatGPT is the largest by user volume by a wide margin, and Google AI Overviews reach the most people overall because they appear above ordinary search results. But Perplexity users click through to sources at a notably higher rate, and Gemini is increasingly embedded across Google's products. The practical answer is that no single engine is worth optimizing for exclusively.
Frequently, yes. They weight sources differently — one may lean heavily on review platforms, another on your own site's structured content, another on whatever the live web returns at query time. That is exactly why coverage across engines matters more than perfecting your standing with one.
Yes. Trendzz runs the questions patients actually ask against the major assistants on a schedule and reports where you appear, where a competitor appears instead, and how that shifts over time.